Pharmacor --
December 2006
Introduction:
The hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) market is highly
fragmented, mature, and competitive. However, the continual evolution of
drug-resistant pathogens, the expanding population of severely ill patients at
risk for HAIs, and rising incidence of these infections continue to drive the
need for new antibacterial agents. With a pipeline dominated by next-generation
antibiotics primarily targeting gram-positive infections, the HAI market offers
significant commercial opportunities for agents with novel mechanisms of action
and agents that are effective against multidrug-resistant, gram-negative
pathogens--a growing clinical concern.
Questions Answered in This Report:
Vancomycin has dominated the treatment of serious gram-positive
infections, including MRSA, for decades. Recently introduced anti-MRSA agents
such as linezolid (Pfizer’s Zyvox) and daptomycin (Cubist/Novartis’s Cubicin)
have made inroads but have yet to realize their full potential. Three emerging
glycopeptides, dalbavancin (Pfizer’s Zeven), Theravance/Astellas’s telavancin,
and Targanta’s oritavancin target gram-positive infections, including MRSA. How
will these new agents perform in the increasingly crowded gram-positive HAI
market? Are the new agents likely to replace vancomycin in empiric and
targeted therapy? What is their commercial potential?
Currently, the cephalosporins are the highest-selling class in
the HAI market. Next-generation cephalosporins that have anti-MRSA activity
(Johnson & Johnson’s ceftobiprole and Cerexa’s ceftaroline) are expected to
launch in the next five years. How receptive are physicians to the new
anti-MRSA cephalosporins, a class not traditionally used for treatment of
serious gram-positive infections? Will Johnson & Johnson succeed in
positioning ceftobiprole, potentially the first-to-market anti-MRSA
cephalosporin, as a broad-spectrum agent suitable for empiric therapy? Is there
room for another anti-MRSA cephalosporin? What is the commercial potential for
ceftaroline and future competitors?
Several companies have invested substantial resources in the
development of therapeutic antibodies that target specific pathogens, but only
a few products remain in active development, and even fewer are likely to
launch. What do thought leaders believe about the clinical utility and
future of antibody-based therapies for the treatment of HAIs? What indications
and patient populations will these therapies target? What formulary hurdles
must antibody-based therapies overcome to achieve use in clinical practice and
commercial success?
The treatment of HAIs is often empiric; product selection is
based in part on suspicion of the pathogens that are the likely cause of
infection. The distribution of pathogens associated with HAIs varies
according to the site of infection. What is the pathogen distribution for
each of the most frequently occurring HAI sites? How many incident cases of
HAIs are caused by a particular pathogen annually?
Scope:
Markets covered: United States, France, Germany,
Italy, Spain, United Kingdom, Japan.
Primary research: Forty-four country-specific
interviews with thought leaders, infectious disease specialists, and critical
care specialists.
Epidemiology: Estimates of the HAI patient population
by indication (urinary tract infections (UTIs), hospital-acquired pneumonia
(HAP), bloodstream infections (BSIs), and surgical site infections and
complicated skin and soft tissue infections (SSI/cSSTIs).
Population segments in market forecast: UTIs, HAP,
BSIs, SSI/cSSTIs.
Emerging therapies: Phase II, 4 drugs; Phase III, 8
drugs; preregistration, 2 drugs; registered, more than 32 drugs.
Market forecast features: Patient-based sales
forecast for the four major HAI indications (UTIs, HAP, BSIs, and SSI/cSSTIs)
by agent through 2015.
Pages: 254 |
Tables: 21 |
Figures: 22 |
Citations: 284 |
Drugs: 47 |
Interviews: 44 |
|